How do Allara Health and Function Health compare on pricing?

Allara Health starts at varying prices. Function Health starts at varying prices. Actual cost depends on the medication, dose, and billing cycle you choose.

Allara Health vs Function Health

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Allara Health and Function Health — pricing, peptides, consultation models, and patient reviews.

At a Glance

	Allara Health	Function Health
Rating	No reviews	No reviews
Starting Price	N/A	N/A
Peptides Offered	2	2
Consultation	Hybrid	Hybrid
Lab Testing	No	No
Shipping	3-5 business days	3-5 business days
Headquarters	New York, NY	San Francisco, CA
Founded	2020	2021

Allara Health

RatingNo reviews

Starting PriceN/A

Peptides2

ConsultationHybrid

Lab TestingNo

Shipping3-5 business days

Pros

Clinically grounded approach
Insurance accepted for some services, which is uncommon in the telehealth weight management space
Endocrinology-trained providers with specific PCOS expertise; not generalist prescribers
Addresses root metabolic cause (insulin resistance) rather than treating weight as an isolated symptom
Ongoing care team access, important for a chronic condition that requires longitudinal management
Comprehensive treatment options including metformin, spironolactone, and hormonal therapies alongside GLP-1s

Cons

Not appropriate for patients seeking GLP-1s outside of a PCOS or metabolic health diagnosis
Membership cost is on top of medication costs; total out-of-pocket may be comparable to or higher than integrated GLP-1 platforms
Insurance coverage for consultations is not universal
State availability limitations may exclude some patients
The clinical depth that makes Allara valuable also means the intake and evaluation process is more involved than a simple weight-loss telehealth visit

Function Health

RatingNo reviews

Starting PriceN/A

Peptides2

ConsultationHybrid

Lab TestingNo

Shipping3-5 business days

Pros

100+ biomarker panel at ~$499/year is genuinely competitive
Testing-first approach means GLP-1 prescriptions (and other treatments) are grounded in actual metabolic data, not just a questionnaire
Physician interpretation built into results makes the data actionable for patients without a clinical background
Strong credibility through association with physicians like Dr. Mark Hyman and the longevity/preventive medicine community
Annual retesting creates a longitudinal health picture that most patients have never had access to before
Platform is useful independent of any prescription

Cons

Not designed for patients who simply want a fast path to a GLP-1 prescription
The annual membership fee (~$499) is charged before any prescriptions are issued, which may not appeal to patients primarily motivated by medication access
GLP-1 prescription availability is secondary to the testing mission and should be verified
The platform skews toward patients who are health-data-oriented; patients who find extensive lab data overwhelming or anxiety-inducing may not enjoy the experience
Geographic availability for prescription services may be more limited than for testing

Pros & Cons

Allara Health

Pros

+Clinically grounded approach
+Insurance accepted for some services, which is uncommon in the telehealth weight management space
+Endocrinology-trained providers with specific PCOS expertise; not generalist prescribers
+Addresses root metabolic cause (insulin resistance) rather than treating weight as an isolated symptom
+Ongoing care team access, important for a chronic condition that requires longitudinal management
+Comprehensive treatment options including metformin, spironolactone, and hormonal therapies alongside GLP-1s

Cons

-Not appropriate for patients seeking GLP-1s outside of a PCOS or metabolic health diagnosis
-Membership cost is on top of medication costs; total out-of-pocket may be comparable to or higher than integrated GLP-1 platforms
-Insurance coverage for consultations is not universal
-State availability limitations may exclude some patients
-The clinical depth that makes Allara valuable also means the intake and evaluation process is more involved than a simple weight-loss telehealth visit

Function Health

Pros

+100+ biomarker panel at ~$499/year is genuinely competitive
+Testing-first approach means GLP-1 prescriptions (and other treatments) are grounded in actual metabolic data, not just a questionnaire
+Physician interpretation built into results makes the data actionable for patients without a clinical background
+Strong credibility through association with physicians like Dr. Mark Hyman and the longevity/preventive medicine community
+Annual retesting creates a longitudinal health picture that most patients have never had access to before
+Platform is useful independent of any prescription

Cons

-Not designed for patients who simply want a fast path to a GLP-1 prescription
-The annual membership fee (~$499) is charged before any prescriptions are issued, which may not appeal to patients primarily motivated by medication access
-GLP-1 prescription availability is secondary to the testing mission and should be verified
-The platform skews toward patients who are health-data-oriented; patients who find extensive lab data overwhelming or anxiety-inducing may not enjoy the experience
-Geographic availability for prescription services may be more limited than for testing

Peptide Pricing Comparison

Peptide	Allara Health	Function Health
Semaglutide	Price unavailable	Price unavailable
Tirzepatide	Price unavailable	Price unavailable

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Allara Health or Function Health better?

Allara Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. Function Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. The best choice depends on which peptides you need, your budget, and preferred consultation model.

Which is cheaper, Allara Health or Function Health?

See the pricing table above for a detailed comparison.

Learn More

Allara Health

Full Profile|Read Reviews

Function Health

Full Profile|Read Reviews