Function Health vs Midi Health
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Function Health and Midi Health — pricing, peptides, consultation models, and patient reviews.
At a Glance
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingNo
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- 100+ biomarker panel at ~$499/year is genuinely competitive
- Testing-first approach means GLP-1 prescriptions (and other treatments) are grounded in actual metabolic data, not just a questionnaire
- Physician interpretation built into results makes the data actionable for patients without a clinical background
- Strong credibility through association with physicians like Dr. Mark Hyman and the longevity/preventive medicine community
- Annual retesting creates a longitudinal health picture that most patients have never had access to before
- Platform is useful independent of any prescription
Cons
- Not designed for patients who simply want a fast path to a GLP-1 prescription
- The annual membership fee (~$499) is charged before any prescriptions are issued, which may not appeal to patients primarily motivated by medication access
- GLP-1 prescription availability is secondary to the testing mission and should be verified
- The platform skews toward patients who are health-data-oriented; patients who find extensive lab data overwhelming or anxiety-inducing may not enjoy the experience
- Geographic availability for prescription services may be more limited than for testing
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingNo
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- Video-first model provides more clinical depth than async-only platforms
- Insurance accepted for some services
- Clinicians trained specifically in menopause and perimenopause, not general practitioners covering the topic incidentally
- Metabolic and hormonal co-management reflects clinically appropriate care for the 40+ demographic
- Evidence-based positioning means less reliance on marketing-driven prescribing patterns
Cons
- Video appointment model requires scheduling, which is less flexible than asynchronous platforms
- Insurance coverage is variable
- GLP-1 offering is secondary to the hormonal health core
- Newer platform (founded 2021) with less established track record than older telehealth providers
- Compounded GLP-1 availability is subject to FDA enforcement changes; branded options carry higher list prices
Pros & Cons
Peptide Pricing Comparison
| Peptide | Function Health | Midi Health |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
| Tirzepatide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Function Health or Midi Health better?
Function Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. Midi Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. The best choice depends on which peptides you need, your budget, and preferred consultation model.
Which is cheaper, Function Health or Midi Health?
See the pricing table above for a detailed comparison.