Function Health vs Omada Health
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Function Health and Omada Health — pricing, peptides, consultation models, and patient reviews.
At a Glance
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingNo
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- 100+ biomarker panel at ~$499/year is genuinely competitive
- Testing-first approach means GLP-1 prescriptions (and other treatments) are grounded in actual metabolic data, not just a questionnaire
- Physician interpretation built into results makes the data actionable for patients without a clinical background
- Strong credibility through association with physicians like Dr. Mark Hyman and the longevity/preventive medicine community
- Annual retesting creates a longitudinal health picture that most patients have never had access to before
- Platform is useful independent of any prescription
Cons
- Not designed for patients who simply want a fast path to a GLP-1 prescription
- The annual membership fee (~$499) is charged before any prescriptions are issued, which may not appeal to patients primarily motivated by medication access
- GLP-1 prescription availability is secondary to the testing mission and should be verified
- The platform skews toward patients who are health-data-oriented; patients who find extensive lab data overwhelming or anxiety-inducing may not enjoy the experience
- Geographic availability for prescription services may be more limited than for testing
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingNo
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- Employer and payer-sponsored access means $0 platform cost for many patients
- Behavior change programming is more structured and intensive than most GLP-1 telehealth platforms
- Long-term chronic disease management focus supports patients beyond the initial prescription phase
- Dedicated health coach provides ongoing accountability and behavior support throughout treatment
- Track record dating to 2011 with significant evidence base on diabetes prevention and weight management outcomes
- Integrated management of hypertension, diabetes, and weight within one platform for patients with multiple conditions
Cons
- Not accessible to patients without employer or health plan coverage unless they pursue direct enrollment (which lacks transparent pricing)
- Not designed for fast prescription access
- GLP-1 prescribing is one component of a larger program; patients who only want medication management may find the program structure more than they need
- Geographic expansion of direct access and specific health plan participation is not clearly documented publicly
- The coaching layer is strong, but clinical depth for complex cases is not equivalent to obesity medicine specialists
- Compounded GLP-1 availability subject to same regulatory pressures as all other telehealth platforms
Pros & Cons
Peptide Pricing Comparison
| Peptide | Function Health | Omada Health |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
| Tirzepatide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Function Health or Omada Health better?
Function Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. Omada Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. The best choice depends on which peptides you need, your budget, and preferred consultation model.
Which is cheaper, Function Health or Omada Health?
See the pricing table above for a detailed comparison.