How do Function Health and Optavia compare on pricing?

Function Health starts at varying prices. Optavia starts at varying prices. Actual cost depends on the medication, dose, and billing cycle you choose.

Function Health vs Optavia

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Function Health and Optavia — pricing, peptides, consultation models, and patient reviews.

At a Glance

	Function Health	Optavia
Rating	No reviews	No reviews
Starting Price	N/A	N/A
Peptides Offered	2	2
Consultation	Hybrid	Async Telehealth
Lab Testing	No	No
Shipping	3-5 business days	3-5 business days
Headquarters	San Francisco, CA	Baltimore, MD
Founded	2021	2017

Function Health

RatingNo reviews

Starting PriceN/A

Peptides2

ConsultationHybrid

Lab TestingNo

Shipping3-5 business days

Pros

100+ biomarker panel at ~$499/year is genuinely competitive
Testing-first approach means GLP-1 prescriptions (and other treatments) are grounded in actual metabolic data, not just a questionnaire
Physician interpretation built into results makes the data actionable for patients without a clinical background
Strong credibility through association with physicians like Dr. Mark Hyman and the longevity/preventive medicine community
Annual retesting creates a longitudinal health picture that most patients have never had access to before
Platform is useful independent of any prescription

Cons

Not designed for patients who simply want a fast path to a GLP-1 prescription
The annual membership fee (~$499) is charged before any prescriptions are issued, which may not appeal to patients primarily motivated by medication access
GLP-1 prescription availability is secondary to the testing mission and should be verified
The platform skews toward patients who are health-data-oriented; patients who find extensive lab data overwhelming or anxiety-inducing may not enjoy the experience
Geographic availability for prescription services may be more limited than for testing

Optavia

RatingNo reviews

Starting PriceN/A

Peptides2

ConsultationAsync Telehealth

Lab TestingNo

Shipping3-5 business days

Pros

Highly structured meal replacement system with decades of Medifast research behind the Fuelings products
Coach community provides strong accountability, community, and daily behavioral support
Combining a low-calorie structured diet with GLP-1 therapy may produce greater caloric reduction than either alone
Fuelings system removes meal decision fatigue
Large, established coach network with broad geographic coverage

Cons

Coaches are not licensed clinicians
The GLP-1 medical pathway runs through a separate third-party telehealth platform, creating a fragmented care experience where coach and prescribing clinician operate independently
Total combined cost (Fuelings + GLP-1 medication) can exceed $600–$800/month, making this among the more expensive weight management options
Fuelings program uses a multi-level distribution model; coach incentives are tied to product sales, which is a structural conflict of interest patients should understand
Not suitable for patients who want a single integrated clinical program

Pros & Cons

Function Health

Pros

+100+ biomarker panel at ~$499/year is genuinely competitive
+Testing-first approach means GLP-1 prescriptions (and other treatments) are grounded in actual metabolic data, not just a questionnaire
+Physician interpretation built into results makes the data actionable for patients without a clinical background
+Strong credibility through association with physicians like Dr. Mark Hyman and the longevity/preventive medicine community
+Annual retesting creates a longitudinal health picture that most patients have never had access to before
+Platform is useful independent of any prescription

Cons

-Not designed for patients who simply want a fast path to a GLP-1 prescription
-The annual membership fee (~$499) is charged before any prescriptions are issued, which may not appeal to patients primarily motivated by medication access
-GLP-1 prescription availability is secondary to the testing mission and should be verified
-The platform skews toward patients who are health-data-oriented; patients who find extensive lab data overwhelming or anxiety-inducing may not enjoy the experience
-Geographic availability for prescription services may be more limited than for testing

Optavia

Pros

+Highly structured meal replacement system with decades of Medifast research behind the Fuelings products
+Coach community provides strong accountability, community, and daily behavioral support
+Combining a low-calorie structured diet with GLP-1 therapy may produce greater caloric reduction than either alone
+Fuelings system removes meal decision fatigue
+Large, established coach network with broad geographic coverage

Cons

-Coaches are not licensed clinicians
-The GLP-1 medical pathway runs through a separate third-party telehealth platform, creating a fragmented care experience where coach and prescribing clinician operate independently
-Total combined cost (Fuelings + GLP-1 medication) can exceed $600–$800/month, making this among the more expensive weight management options
-Fuelings program uses a multi-level distribution model; coach incentives are tied to product sales, which is a structural conflict of interest patients should understand
-Not suitable for patients who want a single integrated clinical program

Peptide Pricing Comparison

Peptide	Function Health	Optavia
Semaglutide	Price unavailable	Price unavailable
Tirzepatide	Price unavailable	Price unavailable

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Function Health or Optavia better?

Function Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. Optavia offers 2 peptides and async telehealth consultations. The best choice depends on which peptides you need, your budget, and preferred consultation model.

Which is cheaper, Function Health or Optavia?

See the pricing table above for a detailed comparison.

Learn More

Function Health

Full Profile|Read Reviews

Optavia

Full Profile|Read Reviews