Function Health vs Paloma Health
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Function Health and Paloma Health — pricing, peptides, consultation models, and patient reviews.
At a Glance
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingNo
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- 100+ biomarker panel at ~$499/year is genuinely competitive
- Testing-first approach means GLP-1 prescriptions (and other treatments) are grounded in actual metabolic data, not just a questionnaire
- Physician interpretation built into results makes the data actionable for patients without a clinical background
- Strong credibility through association with physicians like Dr. Mark Hyman and the longevity/preventive medicine community
- Annual retesting creates a longitudinal health picture that most patients have never had access to before
- Platform is useful independent of any prescription
Cons
- Not designed for patients who simply want a fast path to a GLP-1 prescription
- The annual membership fee (~$499) is charged before any prescriptions are issued, which may not appeal to patients primarily motivated by medication access
- GLP-1 prescription availability is secondary to the testing mission and should be verified
- The platform skews toward patients who are health-data-oriented; patients who find extensive lab data overwhelming or anxiety-inducing may not enjoy the experience
- Geographic availability for prescription services may be more limited than for testing
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingYes
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- Comprehensive thyroid testing included in membership
- Insurance accepted for consultations, which reduces out-of-pocket cost compared to most GLP-1 platforms
- Thyroid optimization before or alongside GLP-1 prescribing is clinically more thorough than platforms that ignore thyroid status
- Specialist-level thyroid knowledge; providers understand the nuances of T3/T4 ratios and symptom-lab discordance
- At-home lab testing removes a significant barrier for patients who struggle to access phlebotomy services
- Addresses a frequently missed root cause of weight-loss resistance
Cons
- Primarily a thyroid platform; patients without thyroid concerns may find it a poor fit for standalone weight management
- GLP-1 prescribing is a secondary offering
- Membership fees plus medication costs can add up; the total may exceed single-service weight-loss platforms
- State availability is broad but not universal
- Patients without a thyroid diagnosis may find the intake process more involved than they expected for weight management alone
Pros & Cons
Peptide Pricing Comparison
| Peptide | Function Health | Paloma Health |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
| Tirzepatide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Function Health or Paloma Health better?
Function Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. Paloma Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. The best choice depends on which peptides you need, your budget, and preferred consultation model.
Which is cheaper, Function Health or Paloma Health?
See the pricing table above for a detailed comparison.