Function Health vs Wild Health
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Function Health and Wild Health — pricing, peptides, consultation models, and patient reviews.
At a Glance
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingNo
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- 100+ biomarker panel at ~$499/year is genuinely competitive
- Testing-first approach means GLP-1 prescriptions (and other treatments) are grounded in actual metabolic data, not just a questionnaire
- Physician interpretation built into results makes the data actionable for patients without a clinical background
- Strong credibility through association with physicians like Dr. Mark Hyman and the longevity/preventive medicine community
- Annual retesting creates a longitudinal health picture that most patients have never had access to before
- Platform is useful independent of any prescription
Cons
- Not designed for patients who simply want a fast path to a GLP-1 prescription
- The annual membership fee (~$499) is charged before any prescriptions are issued, which may not appeal to patients primarily motivated by medication access
- GLP-1 prescription availability is secondary to the testing mission and should be verified
- The platform skews toward patients who are health-data-oriented; patients who find extensive lab data overwhelming or anxiety-inducing may not enjoy the experience
- Geographic availability for prescription services may be more limited than for testing
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingNo
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- Genomic analysis provides a data-rich baseline unavailable from standard GLP-1 telehealth platforms
- Comprehensive biomarker workup identifies metabolic variables that inform better clinical decisions
- Physicians are trained in precision medicine and spend meaningful time per patient
- Appropriate for patients who have specific metabolic complexity or want a data-driven framework for treatment
- Integrated protocol
Cons
- Genomic personalization for GLP-1 response specifically is an emerging area, not a validated clinical standard; patients should calibrate expectations accordingly
- Higher cost than standard GLP-1 telehealth platforms
- Onboarding takes longer due to genomic testing turnaround time (weeks, not days)
- No insurance coverage for membership; accessibility is limited to patients who can self-pay
- Precision medicine framing can attract wellness-oriented marketing language; evaluate clinical quality independently
Pros & Cons
Peptide Pricing Comparison
| Peptide | Function Health | Wild Health |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
| Tirzepatide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Function Health or Wild Health better?
Function Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. Wild Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. The best choice depends on which peptides you need, your budget, and preferred consultation model.
Which is cheaper, Function Health or Wild Health?
See the pricing table above for a detailed comparison.