Included Health vs Winona
A detailed head-to-head comparison of Included Health and Winona — pricing, peptides, consultation models, and patient reviews.
At a Glance
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingNo
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- Real video visits with licensed primary care providers
- Health navigation layer is a genuine differentiator: help navigating insurance appeals, specialist referrals, care decisions
- Widely distributed through employer benefits
- Platform covers primary care, behavioral health, and specialist navigation in one place
- Strong infrastructure and clinical oversight from a well-funded, established company
- All 50 states for telehealth
Cons
- Primarily employer-benefit access
- Not a GLP-1 specialist: patients wanting structured weight loss programs, titration coaching, or compounded options should look elsewhere
- Pricing and access vary significantly by employer
- Doctor on Demand brand (the predecessor) was known for good but standard primary care
- No labs ordered or drawn through the platform
- Less suitable for patients whose main need is low-cost GLP-1 access without employer benefits
RatingNo reviews
Starting PriceN/A
Peptides2
ConsultationHybrid
Lab TestingNo
Shipping3-5 business days
Pros
- Female-only clinician panel is a meaningful differentiator for the 40+ demographic
- Integrated HRT + GLP-1 co-management addresses the actual biology of perimenopause-related weight gain
- Detailed hormonal intake creates more clinical context than standard weight-loss telehealth intake forms
- Asynchronous model is accessible and does not require scheduling around rigid appointment slots
- Platform designed specifically for this population
Cons
- Not appropriate for women outside the perimenopausal/menopausal demographic seeking GLP-1 treatment
- Cash-pay model with limited insurance integration means costs are fully out-of-pocket for most patients
- Compounded semaglutide availability is uncertain post-FDA enforcement; patients should confirm formulation options at time of consultation
- Async-first model may be insufficient for patients with complex or rapidly changing metabolic presentations
- Less brand recognition than larger platforms, which may make some patients hesitant despite clinical appropriateness
Pros & Cons
Peptide Pricing Comparison
| Peptide | Included Health | Winona |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
| Tirzepatide | Price unavailable | Price unavailable |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Included Health or Winona better?
Included Health offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. Winona offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. The best choice depends on which peptides you need, your budget, and preferred consultation model.
Which is cheaper, Included Health or Winona?
See the pricing table above for a detailed comparison.