How do MDLive and Meto compare on pricing?

MDLive starts at varying prices. Meto starts at varying prices. Actual cost depends on the medication, dose, and billing cycle you choose.

MDLive vs Meto

A detailed head-to-head comparison of MDLive and Meto — pricing, peptides, consultation models, and patient reviews.

At a Glance

	MDLive	Meto
Rating	No reviews	No reviews
Starting Price	N/A	N/A
Peptides Offered	2	2
Consultation	Hybrid	Hybrid
Lab Testing	No	No
Shipping	3-5 business days	3-5 business days
Headquarters	Sunrise, FL	New York, NY
Founded	2009	2025

MDLive

RatingNo reviews

Starting PriceN/A

Peptides2

ConsultationHybrid

Lab TestingNo

Shipping3-5 business days

Pros

All 50 states
Insurance integration is deep: most employer plans include MDLive, reducing or eliminating out-of-pocket costs
Backed by Evernorth/Cigna
Covers primary care, urgent care, dermatology, and behavioral health in one platform
On-demand availability for urgent visits
Video visits provide real-time interaction; not async-only care

Cons

Not a GLP-1 specialist: patients seeking structured weight loss programs, dedicated titration coaching, or compounded semaglutide should look at specialist platforms
Pricing is opaque for cash-pay patients; strongly optimized for the insured population
Individual access (without employer benefits) is less seamless than using it through your employer plan
No weight loss program structure comparable to Found, Calibrate, or Sequence
No labs ordered or drawn through the platform (patients need to go to external lab)

Meto

RatingNo reviews

Starting PriceN/A

Peptides2

ConsultationHybrid

Lab TestingNo

Shipping3-5 business days

Pros

Insurance-first model.
Hybrid virtual and in-person care.
Specialist matching.
Broad metabolic health scope.
Physician leadership with relevant credentials.

Cons

No track record.
Self-pay pricing is opaque.
State availability is undisclosed.
Unknown support quality and response time.
Platform maturity unknown.

Pros & Cons

MDLive

Pros

+All 50 states
+Insurance integration is deep: most employer plans include MDLive, reducing or eliminating out-of-pocket costs
+Backed by Evernorth/Cigna
+Covers primary care, urgent care, dermatology, and behavioral health in one platform
+On-demand availability for urgent visits
+Video visits provide real-time interaction; not async-only care

Cons

-Not a GLP-1 specialist: patients seeking structured weight loss programs, dedicated titration coaching, or compounded semaglutide should look at specialist platforms
-Pricing is opaque for cash-pay patients; strongly optimized for the insured population
-Individual access (without employer benefits) is less seamless than using it through your employer plan
-No weight loss program structure comparable to Found, Calibrate, or Sequence
-No labs ordered or drawn through the platform (patients need to go to external lab)

Meto

Pros

+Insurance-first model.
+Hybrid virtual and in-person care.
+Specialist matching.
+Broad metabolic health scope.
+Physician leadership with relevant credentials.

Cons

-No track record.
-Self-pay pricing is opaque.
-State availability is undisclosed.
-Unknown support quality and response time.
-Platform maturity unknown.

Peptide Pricing Comparison

Peptide	MDLive	Meto
Semaglutide	Price unavailable	Price unavailable
Tirzepatide	Price unavailable	Price unavailable

Frequently Asked Questions

Is MDLive or Meto better?

MDLive offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. Meto offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. The best choice depends on which peptides you need, your budget, and preferred consultation model.

Which is cheaper, MDLive or Meto?

See the pricing table above for a detailed comparison.

Learn More

MDLive

Full Profile|Read Reviews

Meto

Full Profile|Read Reviews