How do Nurx and Winona compare on pricing?

Nurx starts at varying prices. Winona starts at varying prices. Actual cost depends on the medication, dose, and billing cycle you choose.

Nurx vs Winona

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Nurx and Winona — pricing, peptides, consultation models, and patient reviews.

At a Glance

	Nurx	Winona
Rating	No reviews	No reviews
Starting Price	N/A	N/A
Peptides Offered	2	2
Consultation	Hybrid	Hybrid
Lab Testing	Yes	No
Shipping	3-5 business days	3-5 business days
Headquarters	San Francisco, CA	United States
Founded	2015	2019

Nurx

RatingNo reviews

Starting PriceN/A

Peptides2

ConsultationHybrid

Lab TestingYes

Shipping3-5 business days

Pros

Simple all-in pricing with no separate membership fee
Both compounded semaglutide and compounded tirzepatide available
Strong women's health reputation built over a decade of telehealth services
Easy onboarding process with fast provider turnaround (typically within 24 hours)
Backed by Thirty Madison, a well-funded parent company
Ongoing messaging with care team included at no extra cost

Cons

Available in only 33 states
No brand-name GLP-1 medications offered (no Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, or Zepbound)
Async-only consultations
No dietitian access, nutritional coaching, or structured lifestyle support
No lab work included or coordinated through the platform
Insurance not accepted for the weight management program

Winona

RatingNo reviews

Starting PriceN/A

Peptides2

ConsultationHybrid

Lab TestingNo

Shipping3-5 business days

Pros

Female-only clinician panel is a meaningful differentiator for the 40+ demographic
Integrated HRT + GLP-1 co-management addresses the actual biology of perimenopause-related weight gain
Detailed hormonal intake creates more clinical context than standard weight-loss telehealth intake forms
Asynchronous model is accessible and does not require scheduling around rigid appointment slots
Platform designed specifically for this population

Cons

Not appropriate for women outside the perimenopausal/menopausal demographic seeking GLP-1 treatment
Cash-pay model with limited insurance integration means costs are fully out-of-pocket for most patients
Compounded semaglutide availability is uncertain post-FDA enforcement; patients should confirm formulation options at time of consultation
Async-first model may be insufficient for patients with complex or rapidly changing metabolic presentations
Less brand recognition than larger platforms, which may make some patients hesitant despite clinical appropriateness

Pros & Cons

Nurx

Pros

+Simple all-in pricing with no separate membership fee
+Both compounded semaglutide and compounded tirzepatide available
+Strong women's health reputation built over a decade of telehealth services
+Easy onboarding process with fast provider turnaround (typically within 24 hours)
+Backed by Thirty Madison, a well-funded parent company
+Ongoing messaging with care team included at no extra cost

Cons

-Available in only 33 states
-No brand-name GLP-1 medications offered (no Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, or Zepbound)
-Async-only consultations
-No dietitian access, nutritional coaching, or structured lifestyle support
-No lab work included or coordinated through the platform
-Insurance not accepted for the weight management program

Winona

Pros

+Female-only clinician panel is a meaningful differentiator for the 40+ demographic
+Integrated HRT + GLP-1 co-management addresses the actual biology of perimenopause-related weight gain
+Detailed hormonal intake creates more clinical context than standard weight-loss telehealth intake forms
+Asynchronous model is accessible and does not require scheduling around rigid appointment slots
+Platform designed specifically for this population

Cons

-Not appropriate for women outside the perimenopausal/menopausal demographic seeking GLP-1 treatment
-Cash-pay model with limited insurance integration means costs are fully out-of-pocket for most patients
-Compounded semaglutide availability is uncertain post-FDA enforcement; patients should confirm formulation options at time of consultation
-Async-first model may be insufficient for patients with complex or rapidly changing metabolic presentations
-Less brand recognition than larger platforms, which may make some patients hesitant despite clinical appropriateness

Peptide Pricing Comparison

Peptide	Nurx	Winona
Semaglutide	Price unavailable	Price unavailable
Tirzepatide	Price unavailable	Price unavailable

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Nurx or Winona better?

Nurx offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. Winona offers 2 peptides and hybrid consultations. The best choice depends on which peptides you need, your budget, and preferred consultation model.

Which is cheaper, Nurx or Winona?

See the pricing table above for a detailed comparison.

Learn More

Nurx

Full Profile|Read Reviews

Winona

Full Profile|Read Reviews